Technology and the Remaking of Global Interdependence
Luuk Schmitz
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies
Trade volumes persist.
Supply chains span the globe.
Capital moves across borders.
Yet beneath this surface of continuity,
the architecture of interdependence
is being remade.
A vertically integrated system that bundles raw materials, manufacturing, software, and data infrastructure into a singular, non-interoperable architecture.
Following Benjamin Bratton's The Stack (2015): sovereignty is no longer only territorial but architectural — layered systems of computation and governance that cut across borders and redefine who controls what.
This book traces how stacks emerged not from grand strategy,
but from corporate planning routines at the technological frontier.
The dominant image of successful capitalism carried an ethereal quality.
Physical assets were liabilities. Manufacturing was modular.
Suppliers were interchangeable. Interfaces made it all work.
The OEM pyramid: legible interfaces, interchangeable suppliers, value captured at the top.
EVs were supposed to be more modular than combustion engines.
Instead, the empirical evidence showed the opposite.
Battery chemistry cannot be optimized independently from thermal management,
which cannot be optimized independently from vehicle structure,
which cannot be optimized independently from software.
To beat the physics, firms had to beat the market —
internalizing coordination that arm's-length
transactions cannot provide.
Architectural control (eliminate interfaces entirely) vs. Architectural interdependence (colonize the interface)
Volkswagen Group
1,400+ entities · 40+ countries
BYD
~170 entities · China-centric
Firms solved control in a fragmented world.
States nationalized the solution.
Market-emergent stacks harnessed by the state
Architectural conditionality: reconfigure your infrastructure as the price of admission
G42 stripped $2B of Huawei equipment to access the American AI stack
State-incubated stacks projected abroad
Alignment through accumulated integration: workforce skills, tooling, software ecosystems
$200B+ manufacturing FDI since 2019 — exceeding the Marshall Plan
Not weaponized interdependence — exploiting existing network nodes.
Not decoupling — severing flows.
A configuration in which control over multiple layers of a vertically integrated production system forecloses the possibility of exit. Power derives not from controlling a single chokepoint, but from the depth of integration across the stack.
Key insight: The features designed for profit — lock-in, high switching costs, ecosystem dominance — serve equally well as templates for long-term geopolitical alignment.
Resource states (Bolivia, DRC):
control extraction, but depend on CATL's downstream processing to realize value.
European hosts (Germany, Hungary):
have gigafactories — but depend on upstream materials beyond their regulatory reach.
Automakers (BMW, VW):
even cell-only contracts inherit hidden dependencies on proprietary software & raw materials.
Control at one layer does not translate into autonomy across the stack.
The October 2024 EV tariff vote — a referendum on Europe's position in the emerging order.
This pattern is illegible through standard EU cleavages — not North/South, not creditor/debtor.
It becomes legible only through stack exposure.
Luuk Schmitz
luuk.schmitz@mpifg.de · Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies